joshsternberg:

firthofforth:

barthel:

themattsmith:

the-mtblog:

newsweek:

Behold! What the Stop SOPA blackout managed to accomplish in 24 hours.

This also reveals how distressingly ignorant many political representatives are. It seems they just blindly supported it without actually knowing what the hell it was about, and then when they were forced to find out, they learned, and changed their minds.


No, the number of supporters only dropped by 15, while the number of opponents went up by 70. Which is to say:
Most supporters didn’t change their minds.
Most people had no preference as of Tuesday.
Once their constituents made their preference known, they followed the wishes of their constituents.
So if there is a technical issue like this which affects you and you would like your representative to do something about it, tell them. There’s this weird expectation that political leaders, who have to address issues concerning lots of people who aren’t you (the elderly, children, farmworkers, etc.), should have all the same information we do. That’s understandable - we assume a monolithic media environment where everyone reads and watches the same things as us, even though that hasn’t been true for a decade or so, because everyone we interact with online does have the same media diet as us - but it’s not going to protect your interests. Here are some of the things the House considered yesterday: water resources in California, oil and gas rights, increasing the debt limit, the Volcker rule, and NATO’s role in the Western Balkans. SOPA/PIPA is important, but at heart it’s about allowing the DOJ or copyright holders to get a court order that would block payments to the infringer and require their ISP to deny them service. That may make sense to you, but to everyone else it’s a highly technical, niche issue. That doesn’t mean it’s not going to impact a lot of people (so is the Volker rule, and people in the Western Balkans would probably have some feelings on NATO), it just means that you can’t just expect people who deal with a lot of different shit to naturally come to the conclusions you do. You have to tell them - or, better yet, organize and find a way to get lots of people to tell them.
What happened yesterday was content providers got users to act as unpaid lobbyists, and it worked, because lobbying does. Our representatives aren’t stupid so much as they are easily distracted cats; you have to catch their attention, and if you yell the loudest, you get your way. So yell, for fuck’s sake. Don’t expect the political system to work perfectly without any input from you. And get a lot of other people to yell with you.

Barthel wins.

Now if we can only get people to vote…

joshsternberg:

firthofforth:

barthel:

themattsmith:

the-mtblog:

newsweek:

Behold! What the Stop SOPA blackout managed to accomplish in 24 hours.

This also reveals how distressingly ignorant many political representatives are. It seems they just blindly supported it without actually knowing what the hell it was about, and then when they were forced to find out, they learned, and changed their minds.

No, the number of supporters only dropped by 15, while the number of opponents went up by 70. Which is to say:

  • Most supporters didn’t change their minds.
  • Most people had no preference as of Tuesday.
  • Once their constituents made their preference known, they followed the wishes of their constituents.

So if there is a technical issue like this which affects you and you would like your representative to do something about it, tell them. There’s this weird expectation that political leaders, who have to address issues concerning lots of people who aren’t you (the elderly, children, farmworkers, etc.), should have all the same information we do. That’s understandable - we assume a monolithic media environment where everyone reads and watches the same things as us, even though that hasn’t been true for a decade or so, because everyone we interact with online does have the same media diet as us - but it’s not going to protect your interests. Here are some of the things the House considered yesterday: water resources in California, oil and gas rights, increasing the debt limit, the Volcker rule, and NATO’s role in the Western Balkans. SOPA/PIPA is important, but at heart it’s about allowing the DOJ or copyright holders to get a court order that would block payments to the infringer and require their ISP to deny them service. That may make sense to you, but to everyone else it’s a highly technical, niche issue. That doesn’t mean it’s not going to impact a lot of people (so is the Volker rule, and people in the Western Balkans would probably have some feelings on NATO), it just means that you can’t just expect people who deal with a lot of different shit to naturally come to the conclusions you do. You have to tell them - or, better yet, organize and find a way to get lots of people to tell them.

What happened yesterday was content providers got users to act as unpaid lobbyists, and it worked, because lobbying does. Our representatives aren’t stupid so much as they are easily distracted cats; you have to catch their attention, and if you yell the loudest, you get your way. So yell, for fuck’s sake. Don’t expect the political system to work perfectly without any input from you. And get a lot of other people to yell with you.

Barthel wins.

Now if we can only get people to vote…

  1. jewelry-party-ideas reblogged this from urlesque
  2. buypinterestrepinspinslikes reblogged this from onaissues
  3. madrid--airport reblogged this from onaissues
  4. digital-piano-shop reblogged this from onaissues
  5. technology--blog reblogged this from newsweek
  6. legacies-golden reblogged this from onaissues
  7. web-design-article reblogged this from urlesque
  8. paintingbathroomcabinets reblogged this from urlesque
  9. kingsinglebedsize reblogged this from urlesque
  10. howtodecorate reblogged this from urlesque
  11. chinese-herbal-treatment reblogged this from onaissues
  12. gezond-eten-recepten reblogged this from newsweek
  13. organic-yoga-clothing reblogged this from newsweek
  14. homemadebabyfoods reblogged this from newsweek
  15. heribertobarker544 reblogged this from urlesque
  16. ceramickitchentiles reblogged this from urlesque
  17. brown-hair-color reblogged this from urlesque
  18. law-enforcements reblogged this from onaissues
  19. 2012news2013 reblogged this from urlesque
  20. recipes-1 reblogged this from newsweek
  21. ringinginears-treatmen reblogged this from urlesque
  22. letmewatchthis-1 reblogged this from newsweek
  23. swinton-physiotherapy reblogged this from newsweek
  24. vetement-homme reblogged this from newsweek
  25. local-seo-service reblogged this from newsweek
  26. sport-schuhe reblogged this from onaissues
  27. download-vimeo-videos reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
  28. vegas-party-bus reblogged this from newsweek
  29. motorcycle-helmet-reviews-2012 reblogged this from the-mtblog
  30. buy-pinterest-repins-follower reblogged this from newsweek
  31. paintideas reblogged this from urlesque
  32. hiperfloor reblogged this from newsweek
  33. bathroomglass reblogged this from urlesque
  34. desktop-pc-preis reblogged this from onaissues
  35. forex--profit reblogged this from urlesque
  36. imagesandcameras reblogged this from newsweek and added:
    Hello :) veally like your blog and small pictures very cool from Brian at:...
  37. symphony01 reblogged this from onaissues
  38. gezond-eten reblogged this from newsweek
  39. phone-mobile-insurance reblogged this from newsweek
  40. notebooks-billiger reblogged this from onaissues
  41. makaros25 reblogged this from good
  42. metakomiseis-1 reblogged this from newsweek
  43. christmaswallpaperdesktop reblogged this from newsweek
  44. maldives-holidays reblogged this from josephschmitt
  45. eye-floaters-treatment reblogged this from josephschmitt
  46. euro-2012-live-stream reblogged this from urlesque