joshsternberg:

firthofforth:

barthel:

themattsmith:

the-mtblog:

newsweek:

Behold! What the Stop SOPA blackout managed to accomplish in 24 hours.

This also reveals how distressingly ignorant many political representatives are. It seems they just blindly supported it without actually knowing what the hell it was about, and then when they were forced to find out, they learned, and changed their minds.


No, the number of supporters only dropped by 15, while the number of opponents went up by 70. Which is to say:
Most supporters didn’t change their minds.
Most people had no preference as of Tuesday.
Once their constituents made their preference known, they followed the wishes of their constituents.
So if there is a technical issue like this which affects you and you would like your representative to do something about it, tell them. There’s this weird expectation that political leaders, who have to address issues concerning lots of people who aren’t you (the elderly, children, farmworkers, etc.), should have all the same information we do. That’s understandable - we assume a monolithic media environment where everyone reads and watches the same things as us, even though that hasn’t been true for a decade or so, because everyone we interact with online does have the same media diet as us - but it’s not going to protect your interests. Here are some of the things the House considered yesterday: water resources in California, oil and gas rights, increasing the debt limit, the Volcker rule, and NATO’s role in the Western Balkans. SOPA/PIPA is important, but at heart it’s about allowing the DOJ or copyright holders to get a court order that would block payments to the infringer and require their ISP to deny them service. That may make sense to you, but to everyone else it’s a highly technical, niche issue. That doesn’t mean it’s not going to impact a lot of people (so is the Volker rule, and people in the Western Balkans would probably have some feelings on NATO), it just means that you can’t just expect people who deal with a lot of different shit to naturally come to the conclusions you do. You have to tell them - or, better yet, organize and find a way to get lots of people to tell them.
What happened yesterday was content providers got users to act as unpaid lobbyists, and it worked, because lobbying does. Our representatives aren’t stupid so much as they are easily distracted cats; you have to catch their attention, and if you yell the loudest, you get your way. So yell, for fuck’s sake. Don’t expect the political system to work perfectly without any input from you. And get a lot of other people to yell with you.

Barthel wins.

Now if we can only get people to vote…

joshsternberg:

firthofforth:

barthel:

themattsmith:

the-mtblog:

newsweek:

Behold! What the Stop SOPA blackout managed to accomplish in 24 hours.

This also reveals how distressingly ignorant many political representatives are. It seems they just blindly supported it without actually knowing what the hell it was about, and then when they were forced to find out, they learned, and changed their minds.

No, the number of supporters only dropped by 15, while the number of opponents went up by 70. Which is to say:

  • Most supporters didn’t change their minds.
  • Most people had no preference as of Tuesday.
  • Once their constituents made their preference known, they followed the wishes of their constituents.

So if there is a technical issue like this which affects you and you would like your representative to do something about it, tell them. There’s this weird expectation that political leaders, who have to address issues concerning lots of people who aren’t you (the elderly, children, farmworkers, etc.), should have all the same information we do. That’s understandable - we assume a monolithic media environment where everyone reads and watches the same things as us, even though that hasn’t been true for a decade or so, because everyone we interact with online does have the same media diet as us - but it’s not going to protect your interests. Here are some of the things the House considered yesterday: water resources in California, oil and gas rights, increasing the debt limit, the Volcker rule, and NATO’s role in the Western Balkans. SOPA/PIPA is important, but at heart it’s about allowing the DOJ or copyright holders to get a court order that would block payments to the infringer and require their ISP to deny them service. That may make sense to you, but to everyone else it’s a highly technical, niche issue. That doesn’t mean it’s not going to impact a lot of people (so is the Volker rule, and people in the Western Balkans would probably have some feelings on NATO), it just means that you can’t just expect people who deal with a lot of different shit to naturally come to the conclusions you do. You have to tell them - or, better yet, organize and find a way to get lots of people to tell them.

What happened yesterday was content providers got users to act as unpaid lobbyists, and it worked, because lobbying does. Our representatives aren’t stupid so much as they are easily distracted cats; you have to catch their attention, and if you yell the loudest, you get your way. So yell, for fuck’s sake. Don’t expect the political system to work perfectly without any input from you. And get a lot of other people to yell with you.

Barthel wins.

Now if we can only get people to vote…

  1. utah-mortgage-loans reblogged this from newsweek
  2. indoor-tanning-bed-lotions reblogged this from newsweek
  3. dog-wireless reblogged this from newsweek
  4. is-sushi-healthy reblogged this from newsweek
  5. cruise-ship-vacations reblogged this from newsweek
  6. how-to-begin-a-website reblogged this from newsweek
  7. bangla-health-information-site reblogged this from newsweek
  8. denver-modeling reblogged this from newsweek
  9. plumbers-madison-wi reblogged this from newsweek
  10. plumbers-in-scottsdale reblogged this from newsweek
  11. working-online reblogged this from newsweek
  12. off--the-grid reblogged this from newsweek
  13. comprar-stevia reblogged this from newsweek
  14. dog-training-methods reblogged this from newsweek
  15. ohio-mineral-rights reblogged this from newsweek
  16. baby--shoes reblogged this from newsweek
  17. offshoretoushi reblogged this from newsweek
  18. reviewers-1 reblogged this from newsweek
  19. designer--handbags reblogged this from newsweek
  20. prasouda--diet reblogged this from newsweek
  21. revolum reblogged this from newsweek
  22. how-to-win-at-roulette reblogged this from newsweek
  23. hair-loss-treatment-west-sussex reblogged this from newsweek
  24. venue-hire-essex reblogged this from newsweek
  25. consumer-1 reblogged this from newsweek
  26. penny----stocks reblogged this from newsweek
  27. restylane-1 reblogged this from newsweek
  28. osha--training reblogged this from newsweek
  29. making---beer reblogged this from newsweek
  30. bargainhomes reblogged this from newsweek
  31. social-fans reblogged this from newsweek
  32. product-model reblogged this from newsweek
  33. tvfreeload-1 reblogged this from newsweek
  34. sit-and-stand-strollers reblogged this from newsweek
  35. ipad-3-release reblogged this from newsweek
  36. professional-resume-writer reblogged this from newsweek
  37. global-photographer-of-the-year reblogged this from newsweek
  38. new-toyota reblogged this from newsweek
  39. cure-for-colic reblogged this from newsweek
  40. way-to-earn-money reblogged this from newsweek
  41. project--payday-scam reblogged this from newsweek
  42. pandora--bracelets reblogged this from newsweek
  43. wimpern reblogged this from newsweek
  44. pst--repair reblogged this from newsweek
  45. iwanttobeeffystonem reblogged this from fuckyeahrandombritishindiebands
  46. mckinney-wedding-photographer reblogged this from newsweek
  47. dallas-website-design reblogged this from newsweek
  48. dallas-fencing reblogged this from newsweek
  49. dallas-wedding-photographers reblogged this from newsweek